Legal Opinion

Saenz v. State Fund Workers' Compensation Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 27, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 96-0202PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Judge.

Joe Saenz (“Saenz”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor *473of the Arizona State Compensation Fund (“the Fund”) on Saenz’s claims for bad faith, breach of contract, and punitive damages. Saenz claimed that the Fund acted in bad faith and breached the parties’ settlement agreement when it transmitted a portion of the settlement amount to the clerk of the superior court under an order of assignment. We hold that in complying with the order of assignment, the Fund was not required to wait thirty-one days before transmitting the funds and was in fact…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Inter-Tel, Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Macintyre v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Saenz v. STATE FUND WORKERS'S COMP. INS.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API