Legal Opinion

National Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 16, 1999No. 1 CA-CV 98-0031PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Judge

¶ 1 National Bank of Arizona (“NBA”) sought a declaratory judgment against St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“StPaul”) regarding a Directors & Officers Liability Policy (“D & 0 Policy”) NBA purchased from St. Paul. NBA alleged that its D & 0 Policy provided coverage for all costs, charges, and expenses NBA incurred in defending two lawsuits against it. In both lawsuits NBA was named as a defendant, but none of NBA’s directors or officers were named as defendants. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled in favor of St. Paul. We affirm, holding…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Gyler v. Mission InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE v. GannonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Medical Mutual Insurance v. Indian Harbor InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Lukes v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  3. Airborne Freight Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Dba Airborne Express Inc v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. ALVORD INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
  5. Navigators Specialty Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API