Legal Opinion
Berens v. Ludwig
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 13, 1997No. 96 C 3534PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALE SI A, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Comptroller of the Currency’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Mark H. Berens’ complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b). For the reasons that follow, the court denies the motion to dismiss, but grants the motion for summary judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Mark H. Berens (“Berens”) owned 33 shares of stock in Marquette Bank Shakopee, NA. (“bank”), making him a minority shareholder in the bank.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mark H. Berens v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the Currency, and Marquette Bank, N.A., as Successor in Interest to Marquette Bank Shakopee, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Berens v. LudwigDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Fidelity Bank National Ass'n v. AldrichDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1997