Union Collection Co. v. National Fertilizer Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; Thomas F. Graham, Judge. Action by the Union Collection Company against the National Fertilizer Company. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll alone. The complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It alleges that the defendant became indebted to plaintiff’s assignor for services rendered at defendant’s special instance and request between the first day of June, 1901, and the thirty-first day of July, 1902; that such services were of the reasonable value of $1,050, and the same has not been paid, except the sum of $46. The assignment to plaintiff is alleged to have been made on the twenty-ninth day of July, 1902, two days before the services were fully…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Eller v. SalatheWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Sucesores de Martínez v. DávilaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912
- Successors of José Martínez v. Tomás Dávila & Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912