Legal Opinion

Successors of José Martínez v. Tomás Dávila & Co.

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided February 24, 1912No. 745Published

Appeal from the District Court of San Juan, Section 1. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolf

This appeal, at the threshold, involves the right of the -respondent to have obtained a judgment on the pleadings. ‘There was a complaint and an answer but the court found *80the answer insufficient and rendered judgment in favor of the complainant. This question was discussed and settled in the case of Horton et al. v. Robert, 11 P. R. R., 181. It has been the custom of the courts of this Island since the Code of Civil Procedure of 1904 went into effect to render these judgments. In the case of an insufficient answer such judgments may be likened to judgments by default inasmuch as, if the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Hentsch v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Greve v. Echo Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Krieger v. FeenyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Union Collection Co. v. National Fertilizer Co.California Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API