Legal Opinion

United States v. Abell

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 18, 1984No. Crim. 82-00018-BPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF RULING ON INTRODUCTION OF ENTRY ON GUILLEN’S BOOKING CARD

CYR, District Judge.

At trial, Government counsel sought to introduce, as evidence of the nationality of defendants Guillen, Valdes and Lopez, booking cards which had been prepared upon the incarceration of those defendants at the Penobscot County Jail. Guillen sought to suppress and exclude his booking card, asserting (1) a violation of his Miranda rights; (2) that his statement constituted an involuntary confession; and (3) a hearsay objection. 1

FACTS

On the evening of July 4, 1982, Agent Mona Polen of the Drug Enforcement…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HerrinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Palacios v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. United States v. KramerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  4. Caldwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. United States v. GillDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API