Legal Opinion

Bresnahan v. Michigan Central Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtG-raves, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action to charge the railroad company for causing the death of her intestate by negligently running over him with one of its engines between Twentieth and Twenty-first streets, a little east of Grand Trunk Junction. The trial judge directed a verdict for the company and the plaintiff alleged error.

One Brooks had contracted with the defendant to lay. water-pipe along its right of way from the river to the shops at Grand Trunk Junction. In carrying on this job Brooks had several companies of men at work upon it and the plaintiff’s intestate belonged to one of these…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. O'ShaughnessyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Anderson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Warnke v. Griffith Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Richards v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API