Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Co. v. O'Shaughnessy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1890No. 14,084PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee seeks a recovery against the appellant for wrongfully causing the death of his intestate, Albert O’Shaughnessy. It is unnecessary to do more than outline the allegations of the complaint respecting the negligence of the appellant, as the single objection urged against it is, that it shows that the intestate was guilty of such contributory negligence as bars a recovery. Shortly stated, the allegations of the complaint concerning the negligence of the appellant are, that it knowingly employed and knowingly kept in its employ an incompetent employee; that this incompetent employee…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railway Co v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CorpsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ames v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API