Legal Opinion

Foster v. Territory of Washington

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1890No. 90PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, King Comity. The facts are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ANDERS, C. J.

The grand jury of King county returned an indictment into the district court charging appellant with the crime of permitting the game of faro to be dealt upon his premises, the body of which is as follows:

“J. H. Foster is accused, by the grand jury of the Territory of Washington, for the county of King, in the Third judicial district of said territory, by this indictment, of the crime of permitting faro to be dealt on his premises, committed as follows: The said J. H. Foster, on the 12th day of January, 1889, in the county of King, in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. LungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  4. People v. SaviersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State of Washington v. Joshua James ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Higgins v. Brown, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Higgins v. Brown, JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Ex Parte BaileyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API