Legal Opinion

J. R. Harding v. Orlando Apartments, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 14, 2014No. 13-11805PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises from James Harding’s claims under the Fair Housing Act (FHA), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq., against Behring-er Harvard District Reit, LLC (BHDR), which owns an apartment complex called the District Universal Boulevard Apartments (the District) in Orlando, Florida. Harding alleged that by failing to remedy certain flaws in the design and construction of the District, 1 BHDR discriminated against people with handicaps in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f)(l)-(2). The district court granted BHDR’s motion for summary judgment, and Harding appealed. Upon review, we affirm. 2

I.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Meyer v. HolleySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Bloch v. FrischholzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Clifton Terrace Associates, Limited v. United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. Parks v. City of Warner Robins, GACourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Citrus Falls at Westchase Apartments, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  2. Harbour Pointe of Perdido Key Condominium Ass'n v. HenkelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Harbour Pointe of Perdido Key Condominium Ass'n v. HenkelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. Harbour Pointe of Perdido Key Condominium Ass'n v. HenkelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. United States v. Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API