Legal Opinion

Parks v. City of Warner Robins, GA

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 26, 1995No. 94-8097PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we consider for the first time in our circuit whether a city’s anti-nepotism policy denies the fundamental right to marry protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, infringes the fight of intimate association implicit in the First Amendment, or has a disparate impact on women in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth-Amendment. The district court held that the anti-nepotism policy is constitutional. We AFFIRM.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff-appellant Brenda Parks is a Sergeant in the Special Investigative Unit of the Warner…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Janet Feliciano v. City of Miami BeachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  3. LaChance v. Duffy's Draft House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Lynda L. Willis v. Conopco, Inc., A.K.A. Lever Brothers Company, A.K.A. UnileverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Young v. City of Augusta Ex Rel. DeVaneyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API