Legal Opinion
United States v. Corrigan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 3, 2019No. 17-3642PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bauer, Circuit Judge.
Following a bench trial, defendant William D. Corrigan ("Corrigan") was found guilty of four counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Corrigan appeals his conviction, arguing that the indictment failed to properly set out a scheme for wire fraud, and the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain a conviction. Corrigan also contends that the district court erred when it ordered restitution in the full amount of the investments. We disagree, and for the following reasons, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
Corrigan served as the President and Chief Executive Officer…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Antonino Cusimano and Philip DucatoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Arthur FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Grayson Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Ronnie CosbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Heon Seok LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Bolden v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.