Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Kichinko

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 29, 1945PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Bill of complaint was filed in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, seeking a declaratory julgment under Chapter 21820, Acts of 1943, to determine the validity or non-validity of Section 3 of Ordinance 2161 of the City of Miami adopted August 16, 1939.

Motion to dismiss was properly denied.

Section 3 of the ordinance which is under attack here is as follows:

“Section 3. From and after the passage of this Ordinance, no vendor’s liquor license, for the sale of liquor to be consumed on or off the premises shall be issued to any person, firm or corporation, as applicant therefor, in excess of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Malone v. City of QuincySupreme Court of Florida · 1913
  2. Mernaugh v. City of OrlandoSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  3. Ex parte TheisenSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  4. Langston v. LundsfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. State Ex Rel. First Presbyterian Church v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Limpus v. NewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Glackman v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Simpson v. GoldwormSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Dixie Inn, Inc. v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  5. Nelson v. State Ex Rel. GrossSupreme Court of Florida · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API