Legal Opinion

AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS v. Tala Bros. Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 16, 2006No. 06 Civ.2072(RWS)PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Tala Brothers Corp. d/b/a Low and Sweet (“Low & Sweet”), and David Talasazan (“Talasazan”) (collectively, the “Defendants”), have moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer this trademark infringement action brought by plaintiff American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (“AEO”) and Retail Royalty Company (“Retail Royalty”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

Prior Proceedings

This action was initiated on March 16, 2006 by the filing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Citigroup Inc. v. City Holding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Pilates, Inc. v. Pilates Institute, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. Red Bull Associates, Gordon Weiss and Murray Weiss v. Best Western International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Aerotel, Ltd. v. Sprint Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  5. French Transit, Ltd. v. Modern Coupon System, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Fteja v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. LaFarge North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. ESPN, Inc. v. Quiksilver, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Dickerson v. Novartis Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  5. Freeplay Music, LLC v. Gibson Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API