Legal Opinion
Hollingsworth v. Cunard Line Limited
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 30, 1979No. 58274PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs below, Mr. and Mrs. Hollingsworth, appeal from the grant of defendant Cunard Line’s "Motion to Dismiss,” based on the ground that Cunard was not subject to the jurisdiction of the court under the state’s Long Arm Statute, Code Ann. § 24-113.1 (Ga. L. 1966, p. 343; 1970, pp. 443, 444).
Mr. Hollingsworth became interested in a round-the-world cruise offered by Cunard in 1976 on the Queen Elizabeth II (QE II) after seeing an advertisement in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution of March 14, 1976. He wrote a letter to the address listed in the advertisement and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coe & Payne Co. v. Wood-Mosaic Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Davis Metals, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gold Kist Inc. v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Hayes v. IrwinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
- Wise v. State Board for Examination, Qualification & Registration of ArchitectsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Michael N. Shingleton v. Armor Velvet CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Continental Research Corp. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.