Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez-Rosario

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 19, 2008No. 1 CA-CR 07-0438PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 Eliezer Rodríguez-Rosario (“Defendant”) challenges his convictions because a juror, when polled, told the trial court he did not agree with the verdict. He argues that the court should have granted his motion for a mistrial. For the following reasons, we vacate the convictions and sentences and remand for a new trial.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1

¶2 An undercover Phoenix police officer purchased twenty dollars of methamphetamine from Defendant in September 2006. Defendant was indicted and tried for possession of narcotic drugs for sale, a class two felony;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. State v. McCrimmonArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. LautzenheiserArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. SabalaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Donald Wayne DaltonArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  3. State v. BeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API