State v. Rodriguez-Rosario
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PORTLEY, Judge.
¶ 1 Eliezer Rodríguez-Rosario (“Defendant”) challenges his convictions because a juror, when polled, told the trial court he did not agree with the verdict. He argues that the court should have granted his motion for a mistrial. For the following reasons, we vacate the convictions and sentences and remand for a new trial.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1
¶2 An undercover Phoenix police officer purchased twenty dollars of methamphetamine from Defendant in September 2006. Defendant was indicted and tried for possession of narcotic drugs for sale, a class two felony;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. NihiserCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State v. McCrimmonArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LautzenheiserArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SabalaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Donald Wayne DaltonArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. BeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020