Legal Opinion
State v. Soto
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 8, 2010No. 2 CA-CR 2008-0405, 2 CA-CR 2008-0406PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Jesus Soto was convicted of various offenses after jury trials in two separate criminal cases, and he filed an appeal in each case. Appellee State of Arizona moved to dismiss Soto’s appeals on the ground this court lacked jurisdiction pursuant to AR.S. § 13-4033(C). After we originally granted the state’s motions and initially denied Soto’s motion to recall our mandate issued in No. 2 CA-CR 2008-0405, we subsequently consolidated the two appeals and recalled the mandates after concluding we had improvidently granted the state’s motions to dismiss…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. CarrigerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011