Legal Opinion
Auburn Urban Renewal Agency v. Samuel Schwartz Sons, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Following the appropriation of defendant’s parking lot in Auburn, New York, the commissioners of appraisal awarded compensation in the amount of $65,000. Defendant appeals from the confirmation of that award on the grounds that the commissioners’ report was insufficient on its face and that the award was based upon an erroneous method of valuation. Pursuant to section 14 of the Condemnation Law, "the only specific duties imposed upon commissioners of condemnation are to hear the proof of the parties, view the premises and make a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Latham Holding Co. v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Adirondack Power & Light Corp. v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- In re City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. HarkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Urban Renewal [Patchen Post]New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Auburn Urban Renewal Agency v. SAMUEL SCHWARTZ SONS, INC.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Saratoga County Sewer District 1 v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Olean Urban Renewal Agency v. Terrace Broadway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Poughkeepsie Urban Renewal Agency v. Dutchess Glass Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980