Legal Opinion
Matter of Urban Renewal [Patchen Post]
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 13, 1978PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Fuchsberg, J.
The issue at the heart of both these condemnation proceedings is whether a building owned and operated by each of the respondent nonprofit organizations was properly classified as a specialty and was therefore correctly evaluated in accordance with the cost of reproduction less depreciation method. In each instance, the building in its present form had been specially constructed for the organization at its clubhouse and had been so used ever since.
In Matter of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency (Patchen Post) the structure was a fraternal meeting hall owned by a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ando v.WoodberryNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Latham Holding Co. v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Acme Theatres, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In re HofbauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Matter of Suffolk (Van Bourgondien)New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- City of New York v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Board of Commissioners of Great Neck Park District v. Kings Point Heights, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Saratoga Water Services, Inc. v. Saratoga County Water AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.