Nesne v. Sundet
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Polk county by Hans E. Nesne and Charles N. Bourdon, copartners as Crookston Marble Works, to restrain defendants, John O. Sundet and others, and Crookston Marble Works, a corporation, from using- the name of the corporation in conducting their business. The case was -tried before Watts, J., who found in favor of defendants. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court in favor of defendants.
In June, 1901, plaintiffs entered into a copartnership at Crookston, Minnesota, under the firm name of Crookston Marble .& Granite Works, *300and engaged in the general bpsiness of manufacturing and selling cemetery monuments. Two weeks later they changed their name to the Crookston Mayble Works, and have since conducted business thereunder.' For nine years prior thereto some of the defendants had conducted a like business at Crookston as copartners under the firm name of Northwestern Marble Works. They used the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Chas. S. Higgins Co. v. Higgins Soap Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Holmes, Booth & Atwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- American Clay Manufacturing Co. v. American Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Atlas Assurance Co. v. Atlas InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Howards Clothes, Inc. v. Howard Clothes Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Northwestern Knitting Co. v. GaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Rodseth v. Northwestern Marble WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Bernstein v. FriedmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.