In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Leisure
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that the accused violated a number of disciplinary rules and statutes by (1) practicing law while suspended from the practice of law for failure to pay an installment due on her annual Professional Liability Fund (PLF) assessment; (2) representing to clients, courts, and opposing counsel, at a time that she was suspended, that she was qualified to practice law; and (3) falsely representing, in her application for reinstatement to the Bar, that she had not practiced law during her suspension. A trial panel of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- School District No. 1 v. Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- Turney v. J. H. Tillman Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Rose v. EtlingOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Martin v. Ore Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- James v. ReconTrust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Liberty Northwest Insurance v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Stanton v. MedellinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- In re WerdellOregon Supreme Court · 2006