Legal Opinion
Herbstein v. Bruetman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 11, 1990No. 89 Civ. 6864 (RWS)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Dr. Martin Bruetman (“Bruetman”), Ronald Tash (“Tash”), Mauricio Agudelo (“Agudelo”), High Tech Medical Parks Development Corporation (“High Tech”), Douglas Kiell (“Kiell”), and Alta Tecnología Medica S.A. (“Altec”) (collectively, the “Bruetman defendants”) have moved to dismiss plaintiff Dr. Diego Herb-stein’s (“Herbstein”) case on the grounds of comity or forum non conveniens, or alternatively, to stay the case until similar proceedings in Argentina are resolved. For the reasons set forth below, the motions are denied. ,
Parties
Plaintiff Herbstein is a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Anglo American Insurance Group, P.L.C. v. CalFed Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Caspian Investments, Ltd. v. Vicom Holdings, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Modern Computer Corp. v. MaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Leutwyler v. Office of Her Majesty Queen Rania Al-AbdullahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.