Legal Opinion

Appeal of Hurst

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 6, 1995No. 93-862PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The petitioner, Donna L. Hurst, appeals a decision by a panel of the New Hampshire Department of Labor Compensation Appeals Board (the panel) denying her claim for workers’ compensation benefits. We reverse and remand.

The petitioner was employed as a meat cutter for Arthur’s Market when she injured herself. Arthur’s Market maintained that the petitioner’s condition bore no causal relation to her employment and refused to provide benefits. The petitioner’s case was heard by a hearings officer, who ruled in favor of Arthur’s Market. The petitioner appealed to the compensation appeals board.

Befor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Milk Dealers' Ass'n v. New Hampshire Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966
  2. Totty v. Grantham Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Appeal of StetsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Thomson v. State Board of ParoleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Appeal of SwiftSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Appeal of the Local Government Center, Inc. & a .Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  2. Appeal of GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. McKay v. New Hampshire Compensation Appeals BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. Appeal of City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  5. Appeal of Wal-Mart StoresSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API