Legal Opinion

City of Stillwater v. Lovell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1932No. 21111PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCullison, J.

This is an injunctional proceeding wherein plaintiffs Instituted this action in the district court of Payne county, Okla., praying an injunction against defendants herein to prohibit defendants from interfering with the use and operation of certain improvements constructed and maintained by plaintiffs as by the record shown.

Plaintiffs for their cause of action against defendants allege and state:

“Petition.
“Comes now the plaintiffs and for cause of action against the defendants and each of them allege and state;
“1. That the plaintiffs are residents and taxpayers of the city of Stillwater,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marietta Chair Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Lacy v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Perry v. New Orleans, Mobile & Chattanooga RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. M. Golden & Co. v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Rost v. MayorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Thomas v. JultakWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ross v. Conco Quarry, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Lindauer v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API