Crawford v. Baker
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is contended by the defendants in error that the trial court properly sustained the demurrer and dismissed the petition, upon the ground that “the contract was unenforceable because it is unilateral and without mutuality; . . that it purports to bind the defendant in error, J. E. Baker, and his assigns for a period of seven and one-half years to sell only and purchase only for resale in the operation of said business petroleum products handled by the party of the first part. There is no corresponding-obligation on the part of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- McCaw Manufacturing Co. v. Felder & RountreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Northwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. BranineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brack v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Naylor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Wehunt v. PritchettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Pate v. Melvin Williams Manufactured Homes, Inc. (In Re Pate)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
- Kent v. GRAHAM COMMERCIAL REALTY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.