Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Arnold and Joseph Grieco
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 18, 1985No. 84-2139, 84-2176PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, Joseph Arnold and Joseph Grieco, appeal their convictions for conspiring to obstruct justice by corruptly influencing a witness to refuse to testify before a Federal grand jury and for obstruction of justice. We affirm.
I
The defendants’ trial in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois revealed that on June 5, 1978, a Federal grand jury investigating the loan sharking activities of Arnold and Grieco subpoenaed one Ralph Carazzo to testify about his debts with the defendants. Car-azzo appeared before the grand jury but, rather…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. Alan ShacklefordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Larry Liefer, George Sharos, and Charles PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Gene R. "Moon" MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Shirley Maggitt and Tommy MaggittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. FrankhauserCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Arthur P. Tranakos, United States of America v. William PilgrimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.