Legal Opinion

Uniroyal Technology Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 24, 1996No. 96-1301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

98 F.3d 993

153 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2649, 65 USLW 2335,

132 Lab.Cas. P 11,683

UNIROYAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, ROYALITE DIVISION, Petitioner,

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent,

and

United Paperworkers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC,

Intervening-Respondent.

Nos. 96-1301, 95-3958.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Sept. 4, 1996.

Decided Oct. 24, 1996.

Cary Schwimmer, Jay W. Kiesewetter (argued), Kiesewetter, Wise, Kaplan, Schwimmer & Prather, Memphis, TN, for Uniroyal Technology Corporation, Royalite Division.

Christopher W. Young (argued), National Labor Relations Board,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
National Labor Relations Board v. Mattison MacHine WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
National Labor Relations Board v. Augusta Bakery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
Van Dorn Plastic MacHinery Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
Carry Companies of Illinois, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

Multi-Ad Services, Incorporated, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
National Labor Relations Board v. Erie Brush and Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
Multi-Ad Services v. NLRBCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
NLRB v. Erie Brush & Mfg CorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005