Legal Opinion

Herring v. Welltech, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1986No. 85-245PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARTHUR T. HANSCUM, District Judge.

Appellant Carl Herring petitioned the district court to reopen his worker’s compensation case, seeking additional benefits under § 27-12-606, W.S.1977 (June 1983 Replacement). His employer, appellee Welltech, Inc., objected to reopening the case, raising as a bar a written stipulation settling the amount of worker’s compensation benefits the employer would pay for appellant’s injury. Appellant appeals from the order of the district court denying his petition to reopen the case.

Appellant claims he should be entitled to reopen the case, contending that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conn v. Ed Wederski Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Herring v. Welltech, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Horvath v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Brigham Young University v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Abas v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Workers' Compensation Claim of Jackson v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Baskin v. State Ex Rel. Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. FMC v. LaneWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. HalsteadWyoming Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API