Legal Opinion · Dissent
ATTORNEY GENERAL EX REL. OPTOMETRY BOARD OF EXAMINERS v. Peterson
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1969No. Calendar 2, Docket 51,662, 51,663PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1DissentAdams, J.
On September 28, 1962 the attorney general filed bills of complaint in these consolidated cases alleging that defendants, opticians, “did wrongfully and unlawfully practice the profession of optometry * * * in that they did diagnose, examine and measure the eyes of certain persons for contact lenses, and did fit, insert, and adjust the said contact lenses to the eyes of these said persons.” The bills were amended to allege the acts constituted a continuing nuisance affecting the public health and welfare for which the criminal remedy provided by the optometry act was inadequate. Permanent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Glover v. MalloskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Portage Township v. Full Salvation UnionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Village of St. Johns v. McFarlanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Attorney General v. Kenco Optics, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Attorney General v. Powerpick Player's Club of Michigan, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. McKendrickMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.