Legal Opinion
Cave v. Conrad
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 2002No. 2000-2083PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 299.] CAVE, APPELLEE, v. CONRAD, ADMR., APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as Cave v. Conrad,
2002-Ohio-793.] Workers’ compensation—Pursuant to R.C. 4123.512(F), reasonable videotaped deposition expenses may be taxed as costs and awarded to a successful workers’ compensation claimant in an action brought pursuant to R.C. 4123.512. (No. 00-2083—Submitted December 11, 2001—Decided February 27, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Pike County, No. 00CA645. __________________ SYLLABUS OF THE COURT Pursuant to R.C. 4123.512(F),…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vance v. RoedersheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Moore v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Centennial Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Benda v. FanaOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Barrett v. Singer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Naples v. Kinczel, Unpublished Decision (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Carrigan v. Shaferly Excavating, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Keener v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017