Legal Opinion

Centennial Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1982No. 81-60PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

This cause presents one issue: whether a court of appeals may tax as a cost the premium paid for a supersedeas bond.

This court has consistently limited the categories of expenses which qualify as “costs.” “Costs, in the sense the word is generally used in this state, may be defined as being the statutory fees to which officers, witnesses, jurors and others are entitled for their services in an action * * * and which the *51statutes authorize to be taxed and included in the judgment ****** q0S|-s not necessarily cover all of the expenses and they were distinguishable from fees and disbursements.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Benda v. FanaOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Dickinson v. Hot Mixed Bituminous IndustryOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Vance v. RoedersheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Christe v. GMS Management Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Howard v. WillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Hagemeyer v. SadowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Williams v. ColasurdOhio Supreme Court · 1995

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API