Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. Greenbush Logistics, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided July 11, 2017No. 1:16-cv-00079PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is Greenbush Logistics, Inc.’s (‘Greenbush') Motion to. Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Amended Complaint (Doc. -No. 23), to which Billy Paul Ramsey has responded in opposition (Doc. No. 27) and Greenbush has replied (Doc. No. 40). For the reasons that follow, the Motion will be granted insofar as Greenbush requests a transfer of this action.
I. Factual Background
The Amended Complaint alleges the following relevant facts:
Ramsey is a resident of Leoma, Tennessee, and works for Greenbush, which is a ‘Domestic Corporation’ with its principal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Corl v. The Kenan Advantage Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Ever-Seal, Inc. v. DuraSeal, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Ncontracts, LLC v. HolmbergDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Ncontracts, LLC v. HolmbergDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Santoni v. MuellerDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.