Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1908No. 5416; No. 3074 C. APublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Denver District Court. Hon. Peter L. Palmer> Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Helm

The objections urged upon this appeal are three-' fold, viz: First, that the complaint fails to state a cause of action; Second, that certain of the instructions given to the jury are erroneous; and, Third, that the verdict and judgment are so defective in form as to require a reversal.

The action is replevin. Defendant, who is also appellant, being engaged in the business of storing personal property for hire, received from plaintiff, for storage, a piano and certain other personalty, consisting of household goods. The usual warehouse receipt was delivered to plaintiff at the time the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. E. H. Rollins & Sons v. Board of Com'rs of Gunnison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. Water Supply & Storage Co. v. Larimer & Weld Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. Wallace v. Minneapolis & Northern Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Goldfield Mohawk Mining Co v. Frances-Mohawk Mining & Leasing Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Dunkle v. FrenchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Startzell v. BowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API