Legal Opinion
Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 21, 1979No. 76-1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROBINSON.
SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON, III, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, Papago Tribal Utility Authority (PTUA) and Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. (AEPCO), and the intervenor, Electrical District No. One (ED-1), challenge the Federal Power Commission’s1 acceptance of a rate-increase filing by Arizona Public Service Company (APS) purportedly pursuant to Section 205(d) of the Federal Power Act.2 Both petitioners contend that this endeavor to achieve higher rates suffered from a fatal lack of supporting data. Additionally, PTUA and ED-1 assert that…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Raymond Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- The City of Piqua, Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Pennzoil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.