Legal Opinion
The City of Piqua, Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 21, 1979No. 78-1487PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TAMM.
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
In this case, we review two orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission): one allowing a rate increase, for good cause shown, to take effect prior to filing with the Commission, 1 and the other reversing the Commission’s rejection of a filing for a firm power rate increase. 2 We affirm both orders as authorized by statute and supported by substantial evidence.
I
Intervenor Dayton Power and Light Company (DP&L) supplied partial requirements electric service to petitioner City of Piqua, Ohio (Piqua or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Boston Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, City of Holyoke Gas and Electric Department, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Cities of Bethany v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Northern States Power Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.