Legal Opinion

United States v. McCALISTER

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 16, 2010No. 09-5101PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the parties’ briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determi nation of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Michael L. McCalister appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for relief from judgment filed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms the district court’s denial of McCalister’s Rule 60(b)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. United States v. GoodwynCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Fred C. Fisher and Charles C. Cohn, on Behalf of Felix Barcelon, Plffs. In Err. v. Colonel David J. Baker, Jr., and Captain John Doe ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. United States v. MosaviCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  3. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2014
  4. Theron M. Christensen v. Iowa District Court For Story CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2025
  5. United States v. CusterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API