United States v. Custer
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
REPORT
YOUNG, District Judge.
On October 28, 2010, the First Circuit retaining jurisdiction, remanded the matter of United States v. Custer to this Court to report on two questions, namely: 1) Why did this Court grant leave to appeal; and 2) on what basis did this Court deny Custer’s motion for re-sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). This Court answers the questions as follows.
1. While appeals in criminal proceedings are not guaranteed by the Constitution, they provide a vital safeguard for criminal defendants from erroneous convictions. See Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 757 n. 1, 103…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. GoodwynCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.