Legal Opinion

Fred C. Fisher and Charles C. Cohn, on Behalf of Felix Barcelon, Plffs. In Err. v. Colonel David J. Baker, Jr., and Captain John Doe Thompson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 3, 1906No. 214PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

203 U.S. 174

27 S.Ct. 135

51 L.Ed. 142

FRED C. FISHER and Charles C. Cohn, on Behalf of Felix Barcelon, Plffs. in Err.,

v.

COLONEL DAVID J. BAKER, JR., and Captain John Doe Thompson.

No. 214.

Argued October 9, 10, 1906.

Decided December 3, 1906.

Messrs. Frederic R. Coudert and Howard Thayer Kingsbury for plaintiffs in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 174-176 intentionally omitted]

Solicitor General Hoyt for defendants in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 176-178 intentionally omitted]

2Opinion of the Court · FullerChief Justice Fuller

1

Application for the writ of habeas corpus was made to the supreme court of the Philippine Islands, August 2,…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. In Re MorrisseySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Rice v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Cross v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by76 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Department of Homeland Security v. ThuraissigiamSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API