Legal Opinion

In re Zimmer Nexgen Knee Implant Products Liability Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 16, 2012No. MDL No. 2272; Master Docket No. 11 C 5468PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REBECCA R. PALLMEYER, District Judge.

Defendants Zimmer, Inc. and its affiliates (“Defendants” or “Zimmer”) are manufacturers of the Zimmer NexGen knee implant devices that are the subject of this multidistrict litigation (“MDL”). In this motion, Defendants seek authority under certain conditions to contact prospective expert witnesses who also happen to be treating physicians for several Plaintiffs whose cases are consolidated in this MDL. As Defendants note, the size of this MDL is significant: it now comprises more than 530 individual actions, and Plaintiffs have suggested…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P.A. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. 1156729 Ontario Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  2. In re American Medical Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2013
  3. In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Williams v. Smith & Nephew Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API