Legal Opinion

Williams v. Smith & Nephew Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 27, 2020No. 1:14-cv-03138Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND In re: Smith & Nephew * MDL No. 2775 Birmingham Hip Resurfacing * Master Docket No. 1:17-md-2775 (BHR) Hip Implant Products * Liability Litigation * Judge Catherine C. Blake * * THIS DOCUMENT RELATES * TO ALL ACTIONS MEMORANDUM Now pending is Smith & Nephew’s motion for an amended order governing ex parte contacts with surgeons and treating physicians. (ECF 2066). For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part, as to the request that plaintiffs’ counsel notify the treating physicians that Smith & Nephew is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kolon Industries Incorporated v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  3. In re Zimmer Nexgen Knee Implant Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  4. In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API