Legal Opinion

United States v. Bendtzen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 2008No. 07-50249PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Frederick Bendtzen pled guilty to bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and was sentenced to eighty-months imprisonment, twelve months below the low-end Guidelines range of ninety-two months, followed by three years of supervised release. Bendtzen appeals the upward adjustment to his offense level pursuant to U.S. Sentenoing Guidelines MaNüal (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2B3.1(b)(2) (2005), which provides for a four-level increase where “a dangerous weapon was otherwise used,” arguing that because he used only a fake bomb, he did not use a dangerous weapon within the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Aguilar-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Samuel Orozco-AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. DuniganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. GallenardoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API