Legal Opinion

Defend v. Lascelles

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 7, 1986No. 4-86-0192PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morthland

This matter involves a permissive interlocutory appeal brought pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d 308). Plaintiffs contest the denial of their motion to dismiss count I of the defendants’ counterclaim sounding in defamation. That defamation claim, in turn, was brought based upon the allegations contained in count IV of the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint charging defendants with a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (18 U.S.C. sec. 1961 et seq. (1982)). The question certified for appeal to this court concerns whether pleadings alleging a…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. White v. NichollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. International Administrators, Inc. And Sheldon Harrison v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Cianci v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Barakat v. MatzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Parrillo, Weiss & Moss v. CashionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  3. Scheib v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Starnes v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API