Legal Opinion
Scheib v. Grant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 15, 1994No. 93-1880PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, Lynn Scheib, her husband Carl Scheib, and her son Benjamin Grosse, brought this action pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (“Title III”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and the Illinois Eavesdropping Statute, 720 ILCS 5/14-1 et seq. Defendants Joan and Burton Grant had served as the attorneys of Lynn Scheib’s former husband and Benjamin Grosse’s father, James Grosse, during custody proceedings in Illinois state court. Defendant Dorothy Johnson had served as Benjamin Grosse’s guardian ad litem (“GAL”). The district…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Organization for Women, Inc. v. ScheidlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. William Allan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Beverly Camp Simpson v. John G. Simpson, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Kurzawa v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cooney v. RossiterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Joan M. Steffes v. Stepan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Oltremari Ex Rel. McDaniel v. Kansas Social & Rehabilitative ServiceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Samuel B. Pollock Jr. And Laura Pollock v. Sandra T. Pollock, Oliver H. Barber, and Luann C. GlidewellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.