Legal Opinion

Murnan v. Isbell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 2, 1928No. 18630PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, 0.

This cause grew out of an attachment proceeding ancillary to a main action on contract in a justice of the peace court between J. H. Isbell & Son, defendant in error, as plaintiff, and on’e P. A. Roberson, as defendant, in which ancillary action J. C. Muman, plaintiff in error, intervened as claimant of the property levied on. In that court judgment went against the defendant in the main action, and for the intervener in the ancillary action, from which latter judgment plaintiff appealed to the district court, where the parties here appeared in reverse order as plaintiff and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Forry v. BrophySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Wollner & Lowenstein v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Arnold v. CoferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Geneva National Bank v. BailorNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Nat. Bank v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Duck v. Selected Investments Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Buellesfeld v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Stephan v. Apartment Hotels, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API