Legal Opinion

Duck v. Selected Investments Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1946No. 31919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Plaintiff Duck sued de-dendant Selected Investments Corporation for the prescribed penalty for usury alleged to have been paid and collected on a loan of money.

The controlling question, or the first question to be determined on this appeal, is whether the trial court committed error in sustaining defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence, discharging the jury and rendering judgment for defendant. Therefore we will here, state only sufficient details of the pleadings and the plaintiff’s evidence to consider and dispose of that question.

In material substance' plaintiff alleged the borrowing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. CurrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Hyde Construction Co. v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Herrian v. Union Equity Co-Operative ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Young v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Murnan v. IsbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Villafuerte v. VillafuerteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Olivas v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  3. James v. Southwestern Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. James v. Southwestern Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API