Legal Opinion

Provident Trust Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 18, 1937No. 18396PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARIS, District Judge.

The question raised in this case is whether the suit was begun within the period required by the applicable statute of limitations. The suit was for the recovery of an internal revenue tax which the plaintiffs claim to have been erroneously or illegally assessed and collected. They filed claims for the refund thereof with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue which were disallowed on February 10, 1933. The applicable statute (section 3226, R.S., as amended 26 U.S.C. §§ 1672-1673 [26 U.S. C.A. §§ 1672-1673]), provides that suits for the recovery of such taxes shall not be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mill Creek & Minehill Nav. & R. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  3. Bennett Day Importing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phoenix State Bank & Trust Co. v. BitgoodDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API