Legal Opinion

Phoenix State Bank & Trust Co. v. Bitgood

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 21, 1939No. 3741PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion by the plaintiff to substitute the United States as sole party defendant in lieu of the present defendant. On or about March 10, 1931, the plaintiff, executor and trustee of the Estate of Rollin J. Plumb, filed an income tax return for the Rollin J. Plumb Trust showing a tax due of $19,519.93. This sum was paid in quarterly installments between March 10, 1931, and December 15, 1931.

On May 19, 1933, the plaintiff filed with the then Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Connecticut, Robert O. Eaton, a claim for refund in the sum of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. L. L. Cohen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Moses v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. United States v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  4. Third Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1932
  5. Toledo Rys. & Light Co. v. McMakenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frank Angelo Bruno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Schwartz v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  4. Royal Worcester Corset Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  5. Royal Worcester Corset Co. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API