Legal Opinion

Bennett Day Importing Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

The complaints in the above-entitled actions, with the exception of the amount claimed as damages for the alleged defaults of the defendants, are substantially the same. ' In each case the amount sought to be recovered is less than $10,000. The alleged liability of the United States is predicated upon the provisions of the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505).

The basis of (ho suits are that plaintiff shipped from Constantinople to New York City, on board the steamship Balsam, owned by the United States, and jointly operated by the United States and C. D. Mallory & Co., Inc., certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Mill Creek & Minehill Nav. & R. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. W. R. Grace & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Federal Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Markle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1925
  3. Provident Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API