Legal Opinion

Houston v. Memphis & Shelby County Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 26, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHERNE, Judge.

The Memphis and Shelby County Board of Adjustment granted a variance to the zoning ordinance of the City of Memphis so as to allow the owners of a lot located at *388the northeast corner of the intersection of Summer Avenue and Graham Street to construct thereon an automobile service station. The lot in question is zoned R-4A, multi-family residential. The owners in 1961 constructed a two-story ten-unit apartment building on the lot, which building has been and is now being used in conformity with the use permitted by the R-4A classification. The protestants, other landowners in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Reddoch v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of Memphis v. Sherwood Building Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Glankler v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McClurkan v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  2. Michael Cobble v. Greene County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  3. Arthur McRae v. Knox CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  4. Dana Looper v. City of AlgoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  5. Jarratt Bell v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API