Legal Opinion

In Re Dunkle

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 2002No. 19-20924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

WARREN W. BENTZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Facts

On August 9, 2001, Bill Dunkle and Judith K. Dunkle (“Debtors”) filed, pro se, a voluntary Petition under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. A review of the Petition reveals that R.L. McCubbins of 6811 North 33rd Street, Suite B, Phoenix, Arizona, 85017-1016, prepared the Petition and schedules as a bankruptcy petition preparer and was paid a fee of $195 for preparation of the forms. The schedules further revealed that Debtors selected exemptions under § 522(d), but did not claim the residence as exempt property in Schedule C, and therefore, it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. In Re GuttierezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2000
  3. In Re MoffettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001
  4. In Re GomezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2001
  5. In Re LyversUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re BushUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2002
  2. In Re RoseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
  3. Scott v. United States (In Re Doser)District Court, D. Idaho · 2003
  4. In Re ThomasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
  5. Martini v. We the People Forms & Service Centers USA, Inc. (In Re Barcelo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API